Skip to main content
Glama
IntelIP

Condere MCP Server

Official
by IntelIP

Condere

Public repository checks

The open-source spin-off analyst for your code.

Point Condere at a software repository to explore whether it could become a business, who would pay, and what to build next. It inspects the code, gathers outside evidence, compares commercialization routes, and returns a pursue-or-stop decision with linked reasoning and a build plan your coding agent can read.

Get started · Use with Claude Code or Codex · Architecture · Report format

Developer preview. The current local storage implementation uses MinIO. Garage is the intended long-term self-hosted replacement; migration and clean-install verification are still in progress. See current limitations.

From repository to business decision

Condere is for maintainers, technical founders, and teams evaluating software they might spin into a product. It considers routes such as open core, managed hosting, dual licensing, services, and AI-native offerings.

  • Understand the asset. Inspect admitted repository snapshots in an isolated sandbox and connect the proposed business to actual code.

  • Investigate the buyer. Gather outside evidence, distinguish observations from hypotheses, and preserve unanswered questions.

  • Compare the options. Explain what stays open, what customers pay for, who buys, and the case for and against each route.

  • Make a structured call. A decision model answers typed questions; code applies gates and records any adjustments to its answers.

  • Hand off the findings. Retrieve the compact result, follow links to supporting evidence, or export the saved assessment without rerunning research.

Quoted claims are checked against saved sources. That establishes quotation fidelity, not proof that a market exists. A recommendation does not authorize implementation, deployment, publication, outreach, or further spending.

Related MCP server: totem-mcp

What you get

The condere.spinoff.v1 report includes:

Part

What it tells you

Decision

Pursue or stop, the selected option and route, probabilities, gates and adjustments

Reasoning

The thesis and the case for and against the options

Analysis

What the software does, rights and ownership questions, and buyer evidence

Next test

The assumption to test, method, success/failure conditions, and estimated effort

Build plan

Proposed capabilities and work packages tied to the software, when applicable

Evidence

Links to claims, sources and detailed artifacts, with hashes and summaries

Start with the compact report and fetch only the detail you need. See the report reference for the contract and retrieval workflow.

Get started

You need Python 3.12 or 3.13, uv, PostgreSQL, an S3-compatible evidence store, and a supported sandbox backend. Research also requires OpenRouter and Exa credentials. Self-hosting storage avoids cloud storage charges; external model and research services can still incur costs.

From the repository root:

uv sync --locked --group dev
cp .env.example .env

Follow the self-hosting guide to configure storage, prepare the sandbox, generate the API identity, and register an explicit research allowance. Once those prerequisites are complete, start the API:

uv run --env-file .env python scripts/run_local.py api

The local API uses bearer authentication at http://127.0.0.1:7778. Connect Claude Code or Codex over MCP, then use an authorized campaign to admit an assessment. read_report retrieves its saved result; read_artifact opens supporting detail and export_assessment saves a portable bundle.

Configuration comes from environment variables. Doppler is optional, and LangSmith tracing is disabled when its API key is absent. See the configuration reference.

Local development and cloud deployment

Component

Local development

Cloud deployment

State and checkpoints

Self-hosted PostgreSQL, with separate databases and roles

PostgreSQL; the hosted deployment uses Neon

Evidence objects

MinIO today; Garage is the long-term self-hosted target

S3-compatible storage; the hosted deployment uses Cloudflare R2

Code inspection

SmolVM; prior verification on macOS Apple silicon

Modal adapter

Tracing

Optional LangSmith

Optional LangSmith

Garage is a planned replacement, not an available Compose setup in this checkout. The runtime uses an S3 interface so storage bindings can differ between environments; each backend still needs to pass the evidence-storage checks. macOS on Apple silicon is the tested local platform. Windows and Linux are untested.

How it works

flowchart LR
    A[Repository and brief] --> B[Sandboxed inspection]
    B --> C[Research and quoted evidence]
    C --> D[Structured analysis]
    D --> E[Typed decision and code-enforced gates]
    E --> F[JSON report and linked artifacts]
    F --> G[HTTP or MCP]

Condere runs on Deep Agents and LangGraph. PostgreSQL holds state, spending records and checkpoints; object storage retains source evidence. Sandboxes inspect code without network access or provider credentials. Model calls and evidence retrieval are handled by the trusted runtime. See architecture.

The runtime supports OpenAI plan sign-in or OpenRouter for analysis, TypeSafe Jev through OpenRouter for decisions, and Exa for search. Apify enables optional research sources. Self-hosted storage does not make external model processing local; review data boundaries before submitting private material.

Open core

The runtime, agent prompts, skills and self-hosting adapters in this repository are MIT licensed. Commercial features are licensed separately and are not included here. Private production configuration, evaluation datasets and improvement routines are maintained outside the public core. See licensing.

Contributing

Read CONTRIBUTING.md for development and verification guidance. Provider-free checks run without service credentials:

uv run ruff check src scripts tests
uv run pytest tests -q

Integration tests are opt-in. Report vulnerabilities privately as described in SECURITY.md.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables MCP agents to maintain durable, evidence-aware project knowledge, retrieve precise excerpts on demand, and track decisions, conflicts, and revisions across sessions.
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    C
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables engineering agents to maintain persistent knowledge across sessions by storing decisions, invariants, gotchas, and rejected ideas, with staleness detection, conflict detection, full-text search, and structured context assembly.
    37
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to analyze a repository evidence-first, answering questions as verifiable claims with source evidence, targeted test observations, and reference resolution.
    5
    112 PyPI
    3
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables an AI coding agent to retrieve decisions captured from earlier sessions, returning recent decisions and topic-matched ones cited by id, plus expanded context, all from a local SQLite database. It also renders briefs at session start so later work starts from what was already settled.
    MIT