TurboPentest
Related Servers
Alternatives to TurboPentest
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for offensive-security tooling, enabling AI agents to run reconnaissance, CVE intelligence, JavaScript analysis, HTTP probing, and port scanning against authorized targets.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceStandalone MCP server that provides security scanning, project mapping, and vulnerability fix generation to AI coding assistants.143 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAI-powered penetration testing framework that can operate as an MCP server, enabling automated security assessments through natural language commands.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates various penetration testing tools, enabling security professionals to perform reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, and API testing through natural language commands in compatible LLM clients like Claude Desktop.7-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that connects an LLM via Ollama to security tools for autonomous or guided penetration testing from a terminal interface.14GPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA penetration testing MCP server that runs 20 hacking tools inside a Kali Linux Docker container, enabling AI assistants to execute security scans and attacks via natural language.2-
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
The four workflow_* tools return instructions rather than performing actions, and are clearly distinguished from the actual action tools (start_pentest, get_findings) by their descriptions. Minor overlap risk exists — an agent could confuse workflow_run_pentest with start_pentest, or workflow_analyze_findings with get_findings — but the descriptions explicitly clarify each tool's role.
All names use snake_case with a consistent turbopentest_ prefix followed by verb_noun (get_credits, list_domains, start_pentest, get_pentest, get_findings, download_report). The workflow_* group inserts a noun segment before the verb, which is a minor deviation but is internally consistent across all four tools.
Twelve tools is well within a comfortable range and each tool maps to a distinct operation in the pentest lifecycle. No redundant or filler tools are present.
The surface covers credits, domain listing, launching, listing, monitoring, findings retrieval, reporting, and attestation verification — a strong full-lifecycle flow. Minor gaps exist: domain addition/verification must be done via the dashboard, and there is no tool to cancel or delete a running pentest, but these are workable.