Skip to main content
Glama
InsForge

Insforge MCP Server

by InsForge

Related Servers

Alternatives to Insforge MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      BackGen's MCP server lets AI assistants scaffold production-ready Express.js + TypeScript backend projects with your choice of ORM (Prisma, Drizzle, Mongoose), install auth/payment/storage plugins, generate CRUD resources, and run health checks — all through natural language conversation.
      10
      124 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Gives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.) unified, secure access to dev infrastructure (Vercel, GitHub, Supabase, Cloudflare, GCP) via a single MCP token.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Instant secure Full Stack Apps and AI Agents
      1,193
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      AI-native open-source backend-as-a-service. Manage Postgres with RLS, auth, file storage, serverless TypeScript functions, durable objects, realtime, KV, AI gateway, and RAG via MCP, either HTTP at /mcp on a self-hosted instance or stdio with npx @butterbase/mcp.
      3,574
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Turns existing backend APIs (OpenAPI) and SQL databases (PostgreSQL, MariaDB, ClickHouse) into hosted MCP servers for AI clients, with built-in dashboards, forms, and credential encryption.
      9 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific resources like buckets, functions, or SQL operations, but some overlap exists: 'create-function' and 'update-function' are clearly related but distinct, while 'get-backend-metadata' and 'get-table-schema' could be confused as both retrieve metadata, though their descriptions clarify the scope. Overall, the descriptions help differentiate tools effectively.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a consistent verb-noun pattern with hyphens (e.g., 'create-bucket', 'delete-function', 'get-table-schema'), which is predictable and readable. There are minor deviations: 'bulk-upsert' uses a compound verb and 'download-template' and 'fetch-docs' have slightly different structures, but these do not significantly hinder clarity.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, the count is well-scoped for a backend management server covering storage, functions, SQL, documentation, and setup. Each tool serves a clear purpose, such as CRUD operations for buckets and functions, and there are no redundant or trivial tools, making the set appropriately sized for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides good coverage for backend operations, including CRUD for buckets and functions, SQL execution, logging, and documentation. Minor gaps exist: there is no tool for updating bucket metadata or listing functions, which could limit lifecycle management, but core workflows like setup, deployment, and debugging are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive