imscc_example_spec

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description accurately indicates a read-only, side-effect-free operation by stating 'returns an example'. It does not disclose more details, but the nature of returning static data is inherently transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that front-loads the action and purpose with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, no output schema, and a simple task, the description fully explains what the tool does and how to use it in context of sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. Per guidelines, baseline is 4. The description does not add parameter info, but none is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns a JSON example and explicitly links it to imscc_build_cartridge, distinguishing it from sibling tools like imscc_build_cartridge (which likely creates) and imscc_check_environment (which checks environment).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage before imscc_build_cartridge to get a template, but does not explicitly state when to avoid or provide alternative tools. It gives good context but lacks explicit guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.