A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables Grok to securely access and manage your local data and workflows through modular capabilities for content, ledger, and profile-scoped workspaces.
19 npm
MIT
Inistate MCP Server
Officialby Inistate
Related Servers
Alternatives to Inistate MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to publish and manage pedagogical content in Moodle via Web Services with guaranteed idempotency. It provides tools for course management, lesson publishing, preview workflows, and direct Moodle API access.56 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to access and manage course data, assignments, grades, announcements, discussions, pages, modules, and files from their institution's learning management system via terminal commands or MCP-compatible AI agents, including previewing and confirming assignment submissions.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to read Moodle course information, list courses, outlines, resources, assignments, and deadlines, and download or extract text from course files locally via an MCP-compatible client.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables an OpenTrek-hosted agent to persist research activities, project status, and advisor requirements, and generate evidence-based progress reports via MCP tools.16-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI clients to connect to a self-hosted DeepTutor instance for accessing learning data, study tools, practice workflows, knowledge retrieval, and learning-state management.581Apache 2.0
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 21 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools target clearly distinct resources/actions, and overlapping pairs like submit_activity vs submit_activities (single vs bulk) and upload_file vs request_upload_url/confirm_upload (fallback vs default flow) are explicitly distinguished in their descriptions. The only mild confusions are the three read-lookup tools (get_form, get_module_schema, get_module_canvas) which are close in purpose, though descriptions do clarify. On the whole an agent can reliably pick the right tool.
Naming Consistency5/5
All 21 tool names are snake_case and follow a verb_noun pattern (validate_design, get_module_canvas, list_entries, create_module, submit_activity, request_upload_url, confirm_upload, switch_mode, etc.). No camelCase mixing or stylistic outliers — highly predictable naming throughout.
Tool Count3/5
21 tools sits in the heavy band and spans several sub-domains (workspace, module design, entry CRUD, aggregation, file upload/download). Given the multi-mode platform scope it is defensible, but it is toward the upper end and a few clusters (three upload tools, three module-read tools) could be tightened.
Completeness4/5
Coverage is strong: workspace select/list, module create/update/validate/design, entry list/get/history/aggregate/form, single and bulk activity submission, and a full presigned upload plus download flow. Entry deletion is handled via the submit_activity 'delete' activity, so the main gap is a lack of module deletion/lifecycle removal, which is a minor omission.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues