Create folder on Proton Drive

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond the annotations. Annotations indicate a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) and idempotency (idempotentHint=true), but the description does not elaborate on what happens if the folder already exists, required permissions, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence) but essentially repeats the title. It lacks additional value such as example usage or notes. While concise, it could be more informative without adding length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (1 parameter, no output schema), the description is too brief. It does not explain behavior on duplicate paths, success/failure responses, or integration with other drive tools. More context is needed for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage, with one parameter 'remote_path' described as 'Remote path for the new folder'. The description does not add additional semantics or format guidance beyond this, so it meets the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Creates') and the resource ('a new folder') along with the method ('using the proton-drive CLI'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'proton_drive_copy' or 'proton_drive_remove' by focusing on folder creation. However, it could be more specific about scope (e.g., parent directory).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'proton_create_folder' or when not to use it. There is no mention of prerequisites or contexts where this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.