Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to elster-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local Windows automation MCP server that lets a KI-Agent safely control the SteuerSparErklärung tax software: inventory and open tax cases, read pages, compare receipts and values, and edit verified working copies, with all ELSTER transmission paths locked tight.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for DACH e-invoicing. Create XRechnung (UBL) and ZUGFeRD 2.3 (Factur-X CII) invoices, validate against EN 16931 rules, extract data from XML, and convert between UBL, CII and JSON formats.
      6
      30 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that validates and writes DATEV-Format (EXTF) files: Buchungsstapel (booking batches) and Debitoren/Kreditoren (customer and supplier master data). Ask your AI assistant why DATEV rejected an import, or have it turn a list of bookings into a file DATEV accepts.
      2
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable clients to read and write directly in epago accounting, including chart of accounts, transactions, invoices, payments, receipts, and tax reports.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions (form_set vs form_add_row vs form_delete_row, ustva_start vs est_start vs eur_start), but several have overlapping read purposes: elster_sync_history and elster_submissions_list both read the same 'Übermittelte Formulare' area, elster_form_check is a subset of elster_form_review, and elster_form_crawl overlaps elster_form_page. Descriptions are detailed enough to mitigate most misselection, but the duplication is real.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names consistently use snake_case with an elster_ prefix and a domain segment (form_, ustva_, session_, sync_), making the pattern predictable. Minor deviations: singular vs plural of the same noun (beleg_upload / belege_list, submission_protocol / submissions_list).

    Tool Count3/5

    32 tools is on the heavy side even for a genuinely complex domain spanning ESt/EÜR/UStVA forms, browser sessions, receipts, drafts, and sync. Several tools look consolidatable (session_list vs session_status, submissions_list vs sync_history, check vs review), pushing it past a comfortably scoped surface.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: login/config checks, form lifecycle (open/new/page/set/add/delete/save/check/review), UStVA-specific helpers, receipts list/upload, eDaten fetch, drafts, and submission history/protocol. Gaps are minor and partly by design (submission deliberately limited to UStVA; no receipt deletion/update, no explicit logout).

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues