search_hosts_by_hostgroup

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose all behavioral traits. It only mentions a default maximum of 10 results. Missing are read/write nature, authentication requirements, sorting behavior, or what happens on error. This is insufficient for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short with two sentences, no fluff. The first sentence is the core purpose, the second adds a behavioral note. It could be better structured but is efficient for its length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and minimal description, the tool lacks enough context for an agent to use it reliably. Missing details include return format, error handling, ordering, and any prerequisites. The description covers only the hostgroup parameter and result limit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds context that 'hostgroup' parameter corresponds to a name or title, which is not fully covered by the schema (0% coverage). However, 'per_page' is only given a default; no additional semantic help is provided. The description partially compensates but not fully.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches for hosts by hostgroup name or title. It uses specific verbs and resource identification. However, it could be more explicit about the output format to fully distinguish from sibling search tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like other search_hosts_by_* tools. The description lacks context on appropriate scenarios, prerequisites, or which sibling tools might be better suited.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.