@inferra-trade/mcp-server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to @inferra-trade/mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to query live cloud GPU pricing, stock availability, and up to 12 months of price history across 30+ hyperscalers, neoclouds, and marketplaces, including comparisons of cheapest listed versus cheapest in-stock offers. All tools are read-only, with provider listings and GPU catalogs available at no cost.8783 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query multi-cloud costs, inventory, waste, and commitments across AWS, GCP, Cloudflare, and OVH through read-only MCP tools.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides public price indices for GPU rentals (spot, on-demand, DePIN) with verify URLs, enabling agents and users to query and verify compute economics rates.51Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePay-per-use tool marketplace for AI agents. Search, price-check, and call APIs via MCP.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to submit GPU job requests, select eligible workers, track execution, and retrieve results via MCP.1421MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMachine-readable AI market data for AI agents: subscription prices, free credits, free LLM models, China-exclusive AI pricing. 6 MCP tools, Streamable HTTP, no auth.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: single-model current price, cross-model price comparison, full market overview, and historical price trends. No two tools overlap in what they return, making misselection unlikely.
Three of four tools follow the 'get_gpu_*' pattern, while 'compare_gpu_prices' uses a verb-object form without 'get'. This is a minor deviation, but the naming is otherwise predictable and readable.
Four tools is well-scoped for a GPU price index server: current price, comparison, summary, and history cover the main use cases without unnecessary redundancy.
The tool surface covers the core lifecycle of price queries (individual, comparative, overview, history). A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated endpoint to list available models, though the summary and comparison tools implicitly provide this information.