Skip to main content
Glama
InferraTrade

@inferra-trade/mcp-server

Official
by InferraTrade

Related Servers

Alternatives to @inferra-trade/mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to query live cloud GPU pricing, stock availability, and up to 12 months of price history across 30+ hyperscalers, neoclouds, and marketplaces, including comparisons of cheapest listed versus cheapest in-stock offers. All tools are read-only, with provider listings and GPU catalogs available at no cost.
      8
      783 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query multi-cloud costs, inventory, waste, and commitments across AWS, GCP, Cloudflare, and OVH through read-only MCP tools.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides public price indices for GPU rentals (spot, on-demand, DePIN) with verify URLs, enabling agents and users to query and verify compute economics rates.
      5
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Machine-readable AI market data for AI agents: subscription prices, free credits, free LLM models, China-exclusive AI pricing. 6 MCP tools, Streamable HTTP, no auth.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: single-model current price, cross-model price comparison, full market overview, and historical price trends. No two tools overlap in what they return, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three of four tools follow the 'get_gpu_*' pattern, while 'compare_gpu_prices' uses a verb-object form without 'get'. This is a minor deviation, but the naming is otherwise predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a GPU price index server: current price, comparison, summary, and history cover the main use cases without unnecessary redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core lifecycle of price queries (individual, comparative, overview, history). A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated endpoint to list available models, though the summary and comparison tools implicitly provide this information.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues