Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to hypruse

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Hyprland desktop automation that allows AI assistants to see the screen, control mouse and keyboard, and manage windows using native Wayland tools. It integrates OCR for text-based interaction and supports complex multi-monitor setups with pixel-accurate coordinate mapping.
      27
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that controls native Wayland windows on KDE Plasma from an AI agent, enabling window listing, screenshots, clicks, typing, and more.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling Hyprland Wayland compositor: screen capture, mouse/keyboard injection, and automation via native Hyprland IPC and wlr protocols.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling Linux desktops over Wayland, enabling AI agents to perform mouse, keyboard, window, and screenshot operations on Fedora KDE Plasma.
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets Claude control Hyprland through hyprctl, providing tools for windows, workspaces, monitors, config, keybinds, notifications, screenshots, app launcher, tags, groups, cursor, blue light filter, wallpaper, and raw hyprctl access.
      48
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control a Hyprland Wayland desktop by listing windows, capturing screenshots, and sending input to a dedicated agent workspace without disrupting the user's screen.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there is overlap between screenshot, zoom, and marks for visual capture. The missing use_bind tool (referenced in binds) may cause confusion. Overall, nearly all tools are well-differentiated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names are single lowercase words (desktop, binds, screenshot, etc.) with no mixing of conventions. The naming pattern is simple and fully consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    9 tools is well-scoped for a desktop automation server, covering state observation, input, and sequencing without being overwhelming.

    Completeness2/5

    Several critical tools are missing but referenced (hypr, use_bind), and there is no explicit tool for common desktop actions like focusing a window or sending compositor commands. This creates dead ends and likely agent failures.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week