Browser MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Browser MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to directly operate a user's local Chrome browser with full login state and cookies, supporting 23 tools such as tab management, clicking, typing, screenshots, file upload, and network inspection through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered Chrome automation through natural language, providing 56+ specialized tools for browser interaction, page analysis, scenario recording, and visual testing.5924 npm9ISC
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control a browser with 30 tools for navigation, interaction, extraction, and tab management, supporting human-like browser automation.363 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides complete browser automation capabilities for AI agents via 44 tools, including navigation, element interaction, state management, and session recording.583 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to control Chrome using real user profiles, providing undetectable automation with over 40 tools for navigation, data extraction, and interaction.34124 npm4MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI agents to directly control your real Chrome browser with full context including login sessions, cookies, and open tabs. It provides tools for page scanning, JavaScript execution, CDP control, screenshots, and physical mouse/keyboard input for authentic browser automation.20243MIT
TDQS
Scored across 39 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct, but browser_console_log and browser_get_console_logs are easily confused, and browser_wait/browser_wait_for could be ambiguous without reading descriptions. Overall, the purposes are well differentiated.
All tools use a consistent browser_ prefix and snake_case naming. However, there is a mix of verb-first (navigate, click) and noun-like (console_log, network_log) patterns, and some tools use 'get_' while others don't, creating minor inconsistency.
With 39 tools, the server exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many'. While the breadth reflects a comprehensive browser automation scope, the sheer number makes tool selection heavier and suggests possible consolidation.
The tool set covers navigation, interaction, waiting, extraction, cookies/storage, console/network monitoring, and tab management—nearly all core browser automation needs. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit alert/dialog handling or dedicated URL/page title getter), but most can be worked around via execute_js or snapshot.