leychile_normas_recientes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description 'últimas normas publicadas' aligns with annotations (readOnlyHint true, openWorldHint true). It discloses the return type (latest norms) but adds no additional behavioral context beyond what annotations already provide. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, front-loading the key purpose. However, it omits parameter details, which slightly detracts from completeness while being efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has an output schema and annotations, the description is very minimal. It does not explain how to use parameters or what the output format entails. The tool is simple, but the description leaves important gaps for an agent to effectively use it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention any parameter. Parameters like 'cantidad' and 'response_format' are left unexplained, forcing the agent to infer from names and defaults. The description fails to add meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves the latest norms published in the Official Gazette. The title 'Normas recientes' and the tool name confirm this. It distinguishes itself from sibling search tools by focusing on recent publications.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for getting recent legislative news but does not explicitly state when to use or not use this tool versus alternatives. No guidance on prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.