Skip to main content
Glama
Ian3738

mplus-mcp

by Ian3738
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mplus-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • JeffersonStats

      sharabhshukla
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive statistical analysis including descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, regression, and more via a FastMCP-based API.
      3
      -

    • ResearchStat AI

      flupke91
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI-native statistical analysis and reproducible research workflows through MCP, including natural language planning, protocol-based analysis, Python/R cross-validation, and publication-ready figure generation.
      MIT

    • mikezero-mcp

      Ultron-1-7
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables headless control of DHI MIKE Zero, including launching and batch-running simulations, monitoring job progress and logs, and reading/plotting simulation results from DFS and RES1D files.
      15
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role in the Mplus workflow: installation status, syntax reference, data conversion, syntax generation, execution from text versus file, parsed output summarization versus raw sections, cross-file comparison, and savedata ingestion. No two tools overlap enough to cause selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case and readable, but they mix verb-first forms (build_syntax, run_syntax, run_file, compare_fit), output_* prefixed forms, and noun-verb forms (data_prepare, savedata_read). The functional prefixes help, but the ordering is not consistent enough for a higher score.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the ideal range and each one maps to a distinct stage of the Mplus analysis lifecycle. None of the tools feel redundant or unnecessary for the server's stated purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the full workflow: checking installation, syntax help, data preparation, syntax generation, running new or existing input files, summarizing output, retrieving raw output sections, comparing model fits, and reading SAVEDATA files. There are no obvious dead ends or significant missing operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources