No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 23 tools
Most tools target a clearly distinct resource+action (logs vs events vs metrics vs entities vs SLOs vs security problems), and pairs like list_metrics/get_metric_descriptor and search_entities/find_entity_by_name are separable from their descriptions. The main fuzziness is within the problem cluster: get_problem already claims to return root-cause evidence and impacts, which overlaps with get_problem_evidence and get_problem_impact, and investigate_problem/debug_service are both RCA-style aggregators that an agent could pick between imprecisely.
Every tool is snake_case verb_noun (list_problems, get_problem_impact, query_metrics, check_connection), including the more elaborate ones like find_entity_by_name and investigate_problem. No camelCase or bare-noun outliers, so the pattern is fully predictable.
23 tools is on the heavy side of the 3-15 sweet spot, but Dynatrace is a broad platform (logs, events, problems, metrics, entities, SLOs, security) and each resource gets a small, coherent list/get pair plus a few aggregate helpers, so nothing looks like pure filler. It is slightly over-scoped rather than bloated.
Read-side coverage is strong and consistent: list/get pairs for problems, events, entities, SLOs, security problems, metrics, plus log search/aggregate and RCA helpers like investigate_problem and debug_service. Gaps are minor but real: there is list_problem_comments with no create-comment/mute/close operation, and no trace listing or trace metadata lookup beyond get_trace_logs, which blocks a few lifecycle workflows.
