SpectraMCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to SpectraMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to process RF signals, perform spectral analysis, and execute radar DSP primitives such as Range-Doppler processing and CFAR detection, supporting both file-based and live SDR capture.14MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceExposes NVIDIA Sionna RT ray-tracing as 15 structured tools for AI agents, enabling wireless channel simulation (scene loading, antenna array setup, ray tracing, CSI extraction) through MCP.-
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that exposes a deterministic force-on-force simulation of FPV sUAS vs counter-UAS RF direction finding as tools for AI agents to run engagements, sweep seeds, and compare configurations.5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language control of a live GNU Radio SDR flowgraph, allowing users to tune frequencies, adjust gain, capture IQ samples, analyze spectra, and detect signals through an MCP-compatible client.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes task management (add, list, complete tasks) and document search (RAG) as MCP tools for AI agents.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables control of Software Defined Radios and decoding of radio protocols through an AI-friendly Model Context Protocol interface, supporting RTL-SDR and HackRF hardware for signal analysis and protocol decoding.24MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the audit workflow: check_action evaluates an intended capability, recent_decisions lists past decisions, and verify_audit_chain checks log integrity. No two tools overlap in purpose, so an agent can easily select the right one.
Two tools follow the verb_noun pattern (check_action, verify_audit_chain), but recent_decisions uses an adjective_noun pattern, which is a minor deviation. The names are still descriptive and predictable.
With only 3 tools, the set is well-scoped for a focused audit and policy-decision utility. Each tool serves a clear and necessary function, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range.
The core audit lifecycle is covered: evaluate an action, list decisions, and verify integrity. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to fetch a single decision by ID or perform detailed historical queries, but these are workable limitations.