Interactive Feedback MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| interactive_feedbackC | 向用户请求交互式反馈，支持文本和图片 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as requesting interactive feedback with support for text and images, and no other tools exist to cause confusion.
The single tool name 'interactive_feedback' follows a clear and consistent snake_case pattern. Since there is only one tool, there is no inconsistency to evaluate, and the naming is straightforward and descriptive.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'Interactive Feedback MCP', which suggests a broader scope for interactive feedback mechanisms. This minimal set may limit functionality and force agents to rely heavily on this one tool for all feedback-related tasks, which is insufficient for typical MCP server purposes.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for an interactive feedback domain. While 'interactive_feedback' handles requesting feedback, there are obvious gaps such as tools for managing feedback (e.g., list, update, delete), analyzing feedback, or supporting other feedback types beyond text and images. This will likely cause agent failures in comprehensive feedback workflows.