A
licenseC
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Redmine instances, managing issues, projects, and metadata through natural language commands.
12
7 npm
MIT
Redmine MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Redmine MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to create, update, and query Redmine issues and projects directly from conversations.263 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI clients (Cursor, Claude Desktop) to manage Redmine issues, projects, time tracking, and wiki pages through natural language.4 npm1ISC
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Redmine through intent-shaped tools for issue tracking, time logging, project management, and more.1912 npm20MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI applications to interact with Redmine project management systems for issue tracking, time logging, and project management through natural language.8 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Redmine project management systems, providing comprehensive access to issues, projects, time tracking, users, and wiki pages through natural language commands.3357 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 18 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools target clearly distinct actions (timer controls, time-entry CRUD, issue search/read/create/update, metadata lists). The main ambiguity is between create_issue, update_issue, and create_or_update_issue, which could cause misselection when an agent is unsure whether an issue already exists.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names use snake_case with a leading verb and a clear object, including compound names like create_or_update_issue and list_time_entry_activities. The convention is predictable throughout the set.
Tool Count4/5
Eighteen tools is slightly above the typical sweet spot, but the server covers two related domains—issue tracking and time tracking—plus supporting metadata and attachments. The tools are reasonably scoped rather than redundant.
Completeness3/5
Core issue and time-entry workflows are covered, including timer-based and manual logging plus time-entry update/delete. However, the issue surface lacks delete_issue, issue comment/journal operations, and richer project/user retrieval, which are notable gaps for a Redmine integration.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues