Skip to main content
Glama
IMAGIN-studio

imagin-studio-api-docs-mcp

Official

IMAGIN.studio API Docs MCPサーバー

AIコーディングアシスタントからIMAGIN.studioドキュメント(CDN設定、APIリファレンス、統合ガイドなど)へ即座にアクセスできるようにします。

一つのツール。一つのコマンド。主要なすべてのAIコーディングアシスタントで動作します。

クイックスタート

エージェントのMCP設定に以下を貼り付けてください:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "imagin-docs": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["imagin-studio-api-docs-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

または、AIアシスタントに直接こう尋ねてください:

このMCPサーバーをインストールして: https://pypi.org/project/imagin-studio-api-docs-mcp/

Related MCP server: @ragrabbit/mcp

仕組み

  1. インストールuvx imagin-studio-api-docs-mcp (クローン不要、venv不要、設定不要)

  2. インデックス作成 — 初回実行時にドキュメントをクローンし、ローカルのベクトルインデックスを構築します(約30秒)

  3. 検索 — AIアシスタントが search_docs を呼び出し、関連するドキュメントを検索します

  4. 最新状態の維持 — 上流のドキュメントが変更されると、インデックスは自動的に更新されます

すべてローカルで実行されます。APIキーは不要です。外部サービスも使用しません。

対応エージェント

エージェント

設定場所

Claude Code

プロジェクトルートの .mcp.json

Claude Desktop

claude_desktop_config.json

Cursor

設定 > Tools & MCP

Windsurf

~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json

VS Code + Copilot

.vscode/mcp.json

Cline

MCPサーバーパネル

Zed

~/.config/zed/settings.json

各エージェントの詳細なセットアップ手順については、PyPIの完全なセットアップガイドを参照してください。

代替手段: npx

エージェントが uvx を見つけられない場合(Claude DesktopやCursorなどのGUIアプリで一般的です):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "imagin-docs": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@imagin.studio/api-docs-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

質問の例

インストール後、以下のようなプロンプトを試してみてください:

  • "IMAGINのドキュメントでCDNキャッシュの無効化について検索して"

  • "IMAGINでカスタムドメインを設定するにはどうすればいいですか?"

  • "画像変換用のAPIエンドポイントを探して"

  • "IMAGIN.studioはどのような画像フォーマットをサポートしていますか?"

パッケージ

レジストリ

パッケージ

インストール

PyPI

imagin-studio-api-docs-mcp

uvx imagin-studio-api-docs-mcp

npm

@imagin.studio/api-docs-mcp

npx -y @imagin.studio/api-docs-mcp

ライセンス

Apache License 2.0 — LICENSE を参照してください。

Available Tools

1 tool
search_docsSearch IMAGIN.studio DocumentationA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search the official IMAGIN.studio technical documentation, integration guides, and knowledge base.

Use this tool when the user asks 'How do I...' questions, needs explanation on API concepts (CDN, referrers, caching, 360 spinner), or needs to debug integration issues. Rewrite vague queries into specific technical search terms before calling.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesNatural language search query. Use specific technical terms rather than vague descriptions. Good: "CDN cache invalidation headers". Bad: "caching stuff".
top_kNoNumber of results to return (1-20, default 5). Use 1-3 for focused lookups, 5 for general questions, 10-20 for broad research.

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
resultYes

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint true, idempotentHint true, destructiveHint false. The description adds that it searches specific content types but does not discuss rate limits, authentication, or result format. It adds some context but not rich behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, no redundant words. First sentence states purpose, second gives usage examples, third provides query rewriting advice. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only search tool with good annotations and output schema, the description covers when to use and what to search. It could mention authentication scope or result limitations, but overall it's reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed descriptions for both parameters. The description does not add per-parameter details beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches official IMAGIN.studio technical documentation, integration guides, and knowledge base. This is specific and complete, with no sibling tools to distinguish from.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use ('How do I' questions, API concepts, debug issues) and provides guidance to rewrite vague queries into specific terms. This is optimal usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool updatev0.1.23
    • First observedsearch_docs

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between different tools. The single tool is clearly described for its specific purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'search_docs' follows a consistent verb_noun pattern, which is clear and predictable.

Tool Count3/5

One tool is minimal and may feel insufficient for a documentation set; however, it might be acceptable if the scope is strictly limited to search. Still, it falls into the 'thin' category.

Completeness3/5

The tool covers the core search functionality, but lacks additional operations like retrieving a specific document or listing available topics, which could be useful for a documentation server.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessSyncing

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables LLMs to interact directly the documents that they have on-disk through agentic RAG and hybrid search in LanceDB. Ask LLMs questions about the dataset as a whole or about specific documents.
    16
    78
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides intelligent access to OPTA football API documentation with automatic authentication, allowing users to query specific endpoint documentation and get answers about soccer match data, events, fixtures, and statistics through natural language.
    6
    -

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/IMAGIN-studio/api-docs-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server