Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Lean MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code, Codex and Cursor to check and verify Lean 4 proofs, inspect goals at a position, try tactics, list holes, and extract declarations against hosted Lean releases with pinned libraries. Edits are checked on warm remote workers that reuse Lean's work between calls, so agents can iterate on proofs against their intended statements.
      20 PyPI
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to compile supplied files, run optional focused tests, and get static findings across ten programming languages, providing a deterministic feedback loop on the code they are about to return.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to discover installed host compilers, execute builds in isolated child environments with timeout enforcement, and convert noisy ANSI-laden compiler logs from Python, Rust, C/C++, Node, and Go toolchains into clean structured JSON diagnostics. It also reports toolchain readiness so agents can avoid blind invocations of missing compilers.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI-driven formal proof search in Lean 4 by submitting theorems with sorry placeholders and running parallel LLM agents whose proposed edits are verified by the Lean compiler until a machine-checked proof is produced. Also provides Mathlib theorem search and job/attempt management tools.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and people to coordinate Lean 4 formalization work by exposing the harness over MCP: derive open/claimed/closed theorem nodes from the compiled environment, lock approved statements, record claims and logs, and run memory-capped build, proof-check, and audit jobs.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so no overlap or misselection is possible. An agent cannot confuse lean_check with anything else.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single snake_case noun-scoped name (lean_check) is internally consistent and clearly readable. Consistency cannot be violated with one tool.

    Tool Count2/5

    A server named 'Lean MCP' implies a broader Lean workflow, yet it exposes only one execution tool. There is no tool for separate diagnostics retrieval, file handling, or environment information, making the surface very thin.

    Completeness3/5

    Execution plus diagnostics return covers the core 'run Lean code' loop, so the primary use case is served. However, related operations such as managing source files, listing library/version info, or iterative editing are absent, leaving notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues