Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to dsh-cua

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      The local MCP server that gives any AI agent safe desktop control. Provides 6 compact tools (computer, accessibility, window, system, browser, task) for cross-platform GUI automation with ground-truth verification.
      1,048 npm
      404
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives any AI assistant eyes and hands on your desktop — screenshots, clicking, typing, OCR, window management, accessibility-tree queries, workflow recording.
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to control Windows by clicking, typing, and navigating with a visible cursor overlay, using a layered approach (native UIA, browser CDP, pixel fallback) for reliable interaction.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets an LLM see and drive any running Windows app: attach a window, screenshot it, read its UI Automation tree, and send clicks, typed text, and key presses with pixel coordinates.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for driving any Windows app through five layers including OCR, UI Automation, and direct OS operations. Enables AI agents to control Windows desktop and OS cursor-free, even on background/locked windows.
      66 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that lets multiple AI agents safely share a Windows desktop by coordinating exclusive access to the mouse, keyboard, screen, and windows, with human consent, takeover, and full activity logging.
      1 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools overlap in purpose: element_action (by ref) vs element_action_at (by skyshot index) perform virtually the same UI Automation action through different handles, and click_at, type_text, and element_action(set_value) can all deliver input to a control. The very detailed descriptions do help tell them apart (ref vs index, soft vs physical input), so an agent can navigate it, but the boundaries are not clean.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Every name is prefixed with tool_ and uses snake_case, giving a predictable surface. Most follow verb_noun (type_text, capture_window, list_windows), though a cluster of element/clipboard tools is noun-first (element_action, element_at_point, clipboard_read), a minor deviation rather than a real inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is on the heavy side but splits cleanly across a broad domain (windows, elements, input, displays, clipboard, app launch, coexistence). Each entry maps to a distinct capability, so the count is justified despite being near the upper comfortable range.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage of the desktop-automation lifecycle is strong: window/element discovery, tree-based and coordinate-based acting, keyboard, text typing, screenshots, clipboard, displays, and app launching are all present. Gaps are minor (no drag-and-drop, explicit scroll-wheel, or window move/resize/close), which agents can largely work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive