Skip to main content
Glama
Humotica

tibet-pol-mcp

by Humotica
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to tibet-pol-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • health-monitor-mcp

      oaslananka
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for monitoring health of MCP servers, GitHub Actions, GitLab pipelines, and HTTP endpoints with health history, TLS expiry, assertions, diagnostics, and alerts.
      22
      92 npm
      2
      MIT

    • automation-health-mcp

      chainwright
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for auditing automation health, finding failures, stale logs, and non-functional endpoints that report success while quietly failing.
      7
      MIT

    • sdlc-integrity-mcp

      AsobaCloud
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides audit and safety-check tools for enterprise SDLC code integrity, enabling AI agents to scan workspaces for lifecycle gaps, mock-theater tests, DRY violations, and language-specific issues in shell, JavaScript/HTML, and Python.
      4
      6 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: running full checks, quick health summaries, comparing results, generating HTML reports, viewing template details, and listing templates. The only similar pair is pol_check and pol_quick_health, but the latter is explicitly a simplified subset, so no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent pattern 'pol_<descriptive_name>', using lowercase with underscores (snake_case). The verbs and nouns are clear and predictable (check, diff, quick_health, report, template_info, templates).

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the count is well-scoped for a process checking server. Each tool serves a distinct function without being redundant or excessive.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full workflow: running checks (full and quick), comparing runs, generating reports, and exploring templates. There are no obvious missing operations for the server's stated purpose of process integrity verification.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources