reunion_list_ecolodge_locations

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided; the description describes a read-only listing operation with no side effects, which is adequate but lacks details on data source or refresh frequency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first states functionality, second lists use cases. No redundancy, information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Describes output (type, coordinates, projection) and domain context, but lacks data source or size. Sufficient for a simple list tool with no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has zero parameters, so baseline is 4; description adds no parameter info because none exist, but this is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists geocoded ecolodge candidate sites in La Réunion with type and coordinates, distinguishing it from all sibling tools that cover different datasets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly mentions applicability for sustainable-tourism planning, real-estate scouting, and regional development studies, but does not include when-not-to-use or compare to alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.