mcp-cyclone-indian-ocean
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-cyclone-indian-ocean
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Mayotte public data, vigilance, administrative references, and local risk discovery, enabling users to search datasets, list communes, and fetch official information.10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for discovering Madagascar-focused humanitarian, weather, risk, and open-data sources, with tools to search datasets, fetch alerts, and get weather information.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for discovering French local natural, technological, and industrial risks at commune level using Géorisques, administrative references, and open risk datasets. It provides tools to query risk sources, datasets, and commune briefs.12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server providing 96 tools across 21 modules for La Réunion (French overseas region) open data: economy, demographics, geography, transport, health, education, elections, tourism, housing, and environment. Powered by data.regionreunion.com and data.gouv.fr.9931 npm2MIT

DevHelm MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for uptime monitoring, incidents, alerting, and dependency status.1291MIT- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for wind forecasts, live measurements, wave forecasts, and tides, enabling kite and surf spot checks via AI assistants.54 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of cyclone monitoring: sources, current activity, archives, vigilance links, alert levels, commune exposure, commune listings, and notable events. No two tools overlap in purpose, making selection straightforward.
All tool names follow the consistent pattern 'cyclone_' plus a verb_noun descriptor (e.g., get_sources, explain_alert_level, list_communes). The naming is uniform and predictable.
With 8 tools, the set is well-scoped for a specialized cyclone monitoring server. Each tool serves a clear function without redundancy or unnecessary bloat.
The surface covers core activities: checking current conditions, historical archives, source listing, vigilance alerts, alert level explanations, and geographic exposure estimation. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct forecast fetch), but the provided tools cover the primary workflows without dead ends.