HubLens MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to HubLens MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to GitHub trending projects through MCP, allowing AI assistants to query popular repositories filtered by language and time range (daily/weekly/monthly).-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes GitHub operations as tools for AI agents, enabling code search, issue management, and PR review.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and analysis of public GitHub repositories for statistics, contributor data, and commit history. It provides both a RESTful API and an MCP interface for seamless integration with AI agents.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to the OSS Insight Public API for GitHub repository analytics. It enables querying trending repositories, contributor statistics, and collection rankings through various tools.1810 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Hacker News that enables AI agents to search stories, read comments, and track tech trends via the public Hacker News API and Algolia HN Search.107 npm4MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP (Model Context Protocol) server for GitHub API integration. This server provides comprehensive tools for interacting with GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, branches, and code search through a unified interface.155 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: hublens_article retrieves detailed information for a specific article, hublens_search performs broad filtering and text-based searches across the archive, and hublens_trending provides ranked trending projects. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'hublens_' followed by a descriptive action (article, search, trending). This uniformity enhances readability and predictability, with no deviations in style or convention.
With only 3 tools, the server feels slightly thin for a comprehensive OSS project analysis domain, as it lacks operations like creating, updating, or deleting content. However, the tools cover core retrieval and search functions adequately for a basic service.
The tools provide good coverage for reading and searching OSS project data, but there are notable gaps in CRUD operations (e.g., no create, update, or delete tools) and limited analytical functions beyond trending. This may restrict agents from performing full lifecycle management tasks.