Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to HubLens MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying and analysis of public GitHub repositories for statistics, contributor data, and commit history. It provides both a RESTful API and an MCP interface for seamless integration with AI agents.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides access to the OSS Insight Public API for GitHub repository analytics. It enables querying trending repositories, contributor statistics, and collection rankings through various tools.
      18
      10 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for GitHub API integration. This server provides comprehensive tools for interacting with GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, branches, and code search through a unified interface.
      15
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: hublens_article retrieves detailed information for a specific article, hublens_search performs broad filtering and text-based searches across the archive, and hublens_trending provides ranked trending projects. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'hublens_' followed by a descriptive action (article, search, trending). This uniformity enhances readability and predictability, with no deviations in style or convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels slightly thin for a comprehensive OSS project analysis domain, as it lacks operations like creating, updating, or deleting content. However, the tools cover core retrieval and search functions adequately for a basic service.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools provide good coverage for reading and searching OSS project data, but there are notable gaps in CRUD operations (e.g., no create, update, or delete tools) and limited analytical functions beyond trending. This may restrict agents from performing full lifecycle management tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing