ruslaw
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_legislationA | Поиск статей, кодексов и законов РФ по смысловому запросу или номеру статьи с фильтрацией по авторитетным порталам (КонсультантПлюс, Гарант, pravo.gov.ru, СОЗД Госдумы). |
| get_norm_textB | Извлечение чистого структурированного текста статьи нормативно-правового акта РФ в формате Markdown (без рекламного мусора, баннеров и навигации). |
| check_norm_statusB | Критический инструмент проверки актуальности нормы: проверяет статус действия статьи, дату действующей редакции и наличие принятых будущих поправок с датой вступления в силу относительно сегодняшнего дня. |
| track_billA | Отслеживание прохождения законопроектов в Государственной Думе РФ (СОЗД ГД): стадия рассмотрения, чтения, профильный комитет и ссылки на паспорт инициативы. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role: discovery of norms, retrieval of norm text, verification of norm status, and tracking of bills. There is little risk of confusing search with retrieval or status checking because the actions and resources are explicitly separated.
All tool names follow a predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern: search_legislation, get_norm_text, check_norm_status, and track_bill. The convention is consistent across the entire set.
Four tools is well-scoped for a focused Russian legal research server. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct step in legal lookup, reading, validity checking, and bill tracking.
The surface covers the core workflow: find legislation, retrieve text, check current status, and track bill progress. Minor gaps remain, such as direct retrieval of full bill text or broader discovery of bills beyond tracking an already known initiative, but agents can largely work around these via provided links.