Broadcast Signed Permission Transaction

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions broadcasting and verification but lacks details on side effects, failure modes, verification outcome, rate limits, or network fees. Insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded, no unnecessary words. Every sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and no annotations. Description explains broadcast and verification but does not cover return values, success/failure criteria, or error handling. Partial coverage for a tool with a post-broadcast verification step.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters have descriptions in schema (100% coverage). Description adds context: poolAddress as 'the pool address that the permission was granted on', signedTransaction as 'from tronWeb.trx.sign()', clarifying its source and structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'broadcast' and the resource 'signed AccountPermissionUpdate transaction', and mentions verification. It distinguishes from siblings like 'build_permission_transaction' (build vs. broadcast) and 'broadcast_transaction' (generic vs. permission-specific).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States 'Use this after signing the transaction from build_permission_transaction', providing explicit prerequisite context. Mentions 'Requires authentication.' However, does not explicitly exclude alternatives or describe when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.