create_mns_queue

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only states the action 'create' plus a vague return message. It does not disclose side effects, idempotency, error handling, permissions, or any behavioral traits beyond the tool name itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with no redundant prose, using a clear Args/Returns structure. It is front-loaded with the purpose statement, though the brevity approaches under-specification.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description should clarify return values and edge cases. It only says 'str: 创建结果信息' (creation result message), lacking details on duplicate queue behavior, permissions, or failure modes, making it incomplete even for a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 0%. The description's arg documentation 'queue_name (str): 队列名称' merely translates the parameter name and type, adding no meaning beyond the schema's 'Queue Name' title. It does not explain constraints, formats, or examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states '创建一个 MNS 队列' (create an MNS queue), using a specific verb and resource. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like delete_queue, send_message, and list_queues, which perform different actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, conditions, or any reference to sibling tools, leaving the agent to infer usage from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.