Skip to main content
Glama
Hookflo
by Hookflo

Related Servers

Alternatives to Tern MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that authenticates incoming webhooks from multiple providers such as Shopify, Stripe, GitHub, Slack, and PayPal using HMAC-SHA256 constant-time verification and timestamp replay-window validation. It lets agents validate and multiplex verified webhook events into dispatched event streams.
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables sending data to webhooks via HTTP POST for both local and remote team environments. It provides a tool for relaying task descriptions, custom metadata, and automated notifications to external services.
      4 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A production-grade MCP server offering modules for GitHub issue/PR triage, live website auditing, and automated release note generation. It provides robust security features like write-operation confirmation gates, rate limiting, and dual-read storage backends.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server with composable tools for GitHub operations, file management, shell execution, kanban boards, Discord messaging, and package management. Features role-based security, HTTP/stdio transports, and a web-based development UI.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: add_webhook creates handlers, get_capabilities provides an overview, list_platforms enumerates supported platforms, manage_dlq handles failed events, and verify_signature validates signatures. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_webhook, list_platforms, manage_dlq, verify_signature), but get_capabilities deviates slightly by using 'get' instead of a more descriptive verb like 'list' or 'show'. This minor inconsistency does not significantly hinder readability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the set is well-scoped for a webhook management server, covering key areas like setup, platform support, failure handling, and verification. Each tool earns its place without feeling excessive or insufficient for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core webhook workflows including creation, platform listing, signature verification, and dead letter queue management. A minor gap is the lack of tools for updating or deleting webhooks, but agents can likely work around this given the server's focus on verification and management rather than full CRUD operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues