Restore a deleted space

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only says 'Restore a deleted space' without explaining side effects, such as whether all content and permissions are restored, or if the space becomes active immediately. The annotations indicate it is mutating and not idempotent, but the description adds no behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with a single sentence. It includes the HTTP method and path, which is efficient. However, it lacks any structured format or additional useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with only one required parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate. It clearly identifies the purpose. However, it could be improved by mentioning the expected state of the space before calling or any prerequisites.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides full coverage for the single parameter (spaceId) with a description. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title and description clearly state the action (restore) and the resource (space). The description includes the HTTP endpoint for reference. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create, update, or delete operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that the space must be deleted first, nor does it specify situations where this tool should not be used. No alternatives are suggested.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.