restart_ha

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the behavioral burden. It discloses the significant side effect of disrupting all operations and states the return type, which is key information for an agent deciding to invoke it.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, containing only the essential elements: action, warning, and return. No redundant or extraneous text, and the structure is clear with a labeled warning and return.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core behavior (restart), the side effect (temporary disruption), and the return (result). Given the tool's simplicity and lack of output schema, this is sufficiently complete without being verbose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so the description's silence on parameters is appropriate. According to the rubric, a baseline of 4 applies when no parameters exist, and no additional explanation is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('Restart Home Assistant') using a verb+resource format, and it is distinct from all sibling tools which focus on dashboards, entities, and other specific operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The warning about temporary disruption implies a maintenance context, but there is no explicit statement of when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when a restart is needed vs. other recovery actions). The guidance is implicit rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.