cleanup_sandbox
Remove and terminate a sandbox instance to free resources and maintain a clean environment.
Instructions
Clean up and destroy a sandbox instance
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sandboxId | Yes | Sandbox ID to clean up |
Remove and terminate a sandbox instance to free resources and maintain a clean environment.
Clean up and destroy a sandbox instance
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sandboxId | Yes | Sandbox ID to clean up |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description lacks details on what 'clean up and destroy' entails (e.g., irreversible resource deletion, effect on running processes, required permissions). The agent is left uninformed about the tool's impact.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the tool's action and object, containing no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's destructive nature and lack of annotations or output schema, the description is too minimal. It does not explain side effects, return value, or usage context, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already describes the parameter sandboxId as 'Sandbox ID to clean up' (100% coverage). The description adds little beyond restating 'sandbox instance', so no substantial extra meaning is provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses the specific actions 'clean up and destroy' with the resource 'sandbox instance', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_sandbox (creation) and list_sandboxes (listing).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites mentioned (e.g., needing a valid sandboxId), and no conditions for use or cautionary notes.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HeurisTech/e2b-sandbox-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server