re-leak-scan
Related Servers
Alternatives to re-leak-scan
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that scans code for exposed secrets (API keys, tokens, private keys, high-entropy strings) with placeholder-aware allowlisting and fully redacted reports, enabling agents to detect leaks before committing.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnterprise-grade MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for detecting secrets and sensitive information in GitHub repositories. Scans for 35+ types of secrets including API keys, passwords, tokens, and credentials with production-ready reliability features.50-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for autonomous AI agents to scan and detect hardcoded secrets, API keys, and passwords in source code files.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Cursor that scans codebases for security issues including hardcoded secrets, SAST, vulnerable dependencies, and IaC misconfigurations.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for static analysis of multi-tenant SaaS and MCP server code, catching cross-tenant data leakage. Provides tools to scan code, list/explain rules, and manage suppressions.5,009 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for ai-scanner that enables AI agents to scan codebases for LLM usage, AI frameworks, and exposed secrets.38 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Most tools are distinct: check_leak_scan for status, extract_strings for raw extraction, find_secrets for catalog detection, scan as a wrapper, and verification tools for URLs/DSNs. However, find_secrets and scan overlap significantly, as scan is essentially a convenience wrapper for find_secrets with all detectors.
Tools predominantly use verb_noun snake_case (e.g., extract_strings, verify_confluence_url), but 'scan' is a bare verb, breaking the pattern. This minor inconsistency does not hinder readability.
With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for a leak scanning server, covering status checking, string extraction, detection, full pipeline, and specific verifications. No unnecessary tools, and the count is appropriate for the domain.
The tool surface covers the core workflow: status check, extraction, detection, and verification for two common services. Minor gaps exist, such as pattern catalog management (listing/updating) and support for more service types, but essential operations are present.