re-gdb
Related Servers
Alternatives to re-gdb
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes pwndbg and GDB for binary debugging, enabling memory inspection, exploit development, remote debugging, and kernel analysis.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceGDB MCP server for binary security research (reverse engineering / PWN) with first-class pwndbg integration, enabling heap analysis, cyclic pattern, checksec, ROP gadgets, and more via MCP protocol.27MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that wraps gdb to enable LLMs to drive live debugging sessions, including starting sessions on binaries, attaching to processes, and running commands.72,593 PyPI3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceHeadless reverse engineering MCP server integrating IDA Pro for static analysis and x64dbg for dynamic debugging via controlled MCP tools.4GPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to control GDB debugging sessions, including breakpoint management, thread analysis, and variable inspection, using the GDB/MI protocol.221MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for reverse engineering Windows executables and related binary formats, offering static analysis, Ghidra-assisted function recovery, plugin-driven tooling, and optional isolated Windows runtime execution.3 npm242MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool targets a distinct GDB operation or GEF feature, with clear separation between session management, memory reading, stepping, breakpoints, and specific GEF utilities. No two tools have overlapping purposes.
Tool names follow a predictable pattern: core GDB operations use verb_noun (attach_pid, read_memory) while GEF-specific tools use the gef_ prefix followed by a noun (gef_heap, gef_registers). Within each subgroup, naming is consistent and intuitive.
14 tools is well-scoped for a GDB interface, covering essential debugger actions (attach, breakpoint, step, memory read) and key GEF features (heap, registers, vmmap, canary, pattern). Not too few nor overwhelming.
Covers core debugging operations but misses common tasks like memory write, expression evaluation, breakpoint deletion, continuing execution, and arbitrary command execution. These gaps may limit agent autonomy for complex reverse engineering workflows.