Skip to main content
Glama
HenriquePvAr

RAMPAP Productivity

by HenriquePvAr
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to RAMPAP Productivity

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • outlook-legacy-mcp

      jatinpurba
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to read, draft, and send emails through legacy Outlook installations via Windows COM automation, using the locally configured Outlook profile without needing Microsoft Graph, OAuth, or server credentials.
      MIT

    • CoreRag

      TJ-Neary
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to perform local-first semantic search, ingest documents, and manage a private knowledge base with hybrid search, PII redaction, and multi-format support.
      1
      MIT

    • WinCtl

      sitharaj88
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Full Windows desktop access for Claude and other MCP clients, enabling screen capture, UI Automation, window/process management, file operations, and shell commands under a tiered permission model.
      22 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 38 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly separated by domain (files vs. Outlook) and by action type. The main confusable pairs are the singular/plural email actions (outlook_mover_email/outlook_mover_emails, outlook_arquivar_email/outlook_arquivar_emails) and the read-only file tools (listar_arquivos, buscar_arquivos, obter_metadados), though descriptions do distinguish them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Naming is generally consistent: Portuguese snake_case, verb_noun pattern, and an outlook_ prefix for all Outlook tools. Minor inconsistencies exist, such as filesystem tools lacking a shared prefix and outlook_status/outlook_diagnostico_* deviating from the verb-first style.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 38 tools, the server is well above the 25+ threshold and feels heavy even for a two-domain productivity tool. Many tools are near-duplicates (singular/plural variants, multiple diagnostic utilities), so the surface could be meaningfully consolidated.

    Completeness3/5

    File and email organization workflows are well covered with list/create/move/copy/rename/trash/batch operations, plus comprehensive Outlook rule management and diagnostics. However, common productivity actions are missing — no sending/reply emails, no file content reading or writing, and no restore-from-trash — so the surface has notable gaps for a general productivity server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources