Skip to main content
Glama
Hemosoo

learning-tool-mcp

by Hemosoo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to learning-tool-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • pdf-card-mcp

      velyan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Converts dense PDFs into soft, minimal, card-based HTML readers with preserved source text, rendered pages, and cropped tables/figures as images, all processed locally.
      3
      31 PyPI
      2
      MIT

    • local-study-app

      resace3
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first flashcard and quiz app with an MCP server for Codex, enabling users to manage decks, cards, quizzes, and reviews through natural language.
      19
      -

    • postgrad-study-mcp

      wasinskivini
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching your local study notes, course code, and lecture PDFs, reading files and PDF pages, registering doubts, and tracking completed lessons. Also provides prompts to generate quizzes and weekly revision plans grounded in your own material with source citations.
      5
      ISC
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or lifecycle stage: ingestion vs retrieval, saving flashcards vs quizzes, review scheduling vs progress reporting. The few pairs that could overlap (get_study_items/get_material, get_due_items/get_session_state) are explicitly differentiated in their descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent imperative verb + noun snake_case pattern (save_, get_, ingest_, list_, submit_, export_, delete_, reset_). The style is uniform, making the action and target predictable across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the ideal range and each serves a distinct function in the study workflow: ingest, generate/save, retrieve, review, track, export, and manage documents. No tool feels redundant or ornamental.

    Completeness4/5

    The core learning loop is covered end-to-end: ingest material, save generated items, retrieve due items, log responses, and monitor progress. Minor gaps exist—there is no way to edit or delete individual flashcards/quiz questions without deleting the whole document—but these are workable and don't block the main workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources