Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Jules AI MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform software development tasks such as codebase analysis, research, planning, requirements and user-story generation, task management, project scaffolding, and multi-step workflow execution. It integrates with MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Cline AI.
      18 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and IDEs to manage workspaces, projects, tasks, and AI agents through natural language, including creation, updates, completion, assignment, and automation. It also supports generating MCP tools from arbitrary OpenAPI specs for broader API integration.
      1,834 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables delegating tasks to agents you configure yourself through OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions backends, with automatic or explicit routing, synchronous calls, persistent asynchronous jobs, and multi-step reviewed workflows. It returns proposals and analyses only, leaving file changes, command execution, and approvals under the MCP client's control.
      29 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action in the Jules task lifecycle: list, create, status, approve, feedback, diff, cancel. The read-style tools (get_task_status vs get_diff) are clearly distinguished by what they return, and approve_plan vs send_feedback are separated by their distinct purposes. No two tools can be reasonably confused.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names follow a strict 'jules_verb_noun' snake_case pattern, e.g. jules_list_tasks, jules_create_task, jules_cancel_task. The prefix is applied uniformly and verbs are unambiguous. There is no deviation in style.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for managing an autonomous coding-task lifecycle. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy or filler. This sits comfortably in the ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the full workflow: create, list, observe status, gate the plan via approval, steer mid-session, retrieve diffs/PR, and abort. Minor gaps remain, e.g. no explicit way to fetch or merge the final PR artifact once complete, but agents can work around this via get_diff.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues