Skip to main content
Glama
Heht571
by Heht571

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_memory_infoB

获取本地服务器内存信息

remote_server_inspectionC

执行远程服务器巡检

get_system_loadC

获取系统负载信息

monitor_processesC

监控远程服务器进程,返回占用资源最多的进程

check_service_statusC

检查指定服务的运行状态

get_os_detailsD

获取操作系统详细信息

check_ssh_risk_loginsC

检查SSH登录风险,包括失败尝试和可疑IP

check_firewall_configC

检查防火墙配置和开放端口

security_vulnerability_scanC

执行基础安全漏洞扫描

backup_critical_filesC

备份重要系统配置文件

inspect_networkC

检查网络接口和连接状态

analyze_logsC

分析服务器日志文件中的错误和警告

list_docker_containersC

列出Docker容器及其信息

list_docker_imagesD

列出Docker镜像

list_docker_volumesC

列出Docker卷

get_container_logsC

获取指定容器的日志

monitor_container_statsC

监控容器的资源使用情况

check_docker_healthC

检查Docker服务的健康状态和基本信息

_list_available_toolsD

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

C2.5/5.0

Scored across 19 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, with clear separation between monitoring (e.g., get_system_load, monitor_processes), Docker operations (e.g., list_docker_containers, check_docker_health), and security tasks (e.g., security_vulnerability_scan, check_ssh_risk_logins). However, some overlap exists between analyze_logs and get_container_logs, as both involve log analysis, which could cause minor confusion.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case for most tools (e.g., check_service_status, get_memory_info), making them predictable and readable. The only deviation is _list_available_tools, which uses an underscore prefix and is less descriptive, but this is a minor inconsistency in an otherwise uniform set.

Tool Count4/5

With 19 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for an operations server covering monitoring, Docker, and security. It avoids being overwhelming (e.g., not 25+ tools) and provides comprehensive coverage without excessive redundancy, though it could be streamlined by merging some overlapping functions.

Completeness4/5

The tool set offers good coverage for server operations, including monitoring (e.g., get_system_load), Docker management (e.g., list_docker_containers), and security (e.g., security_vulnerability_scan). Minor gaps exist, such as lack of tools for updating configurations or handling backups beyond critical files, but agents can work around these with existing tools.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues