get_task
Retrieve a specific task by its unique ID to access its details and status within the thoughtflow execution framework.
Instructions
Get a task by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Task ID |
Retrieve a specific task by its unique ID to access its details and status within the thoughtflow execution framework.
Get a task by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Task ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It declares a read operation but does not disclose error behavior, permissions, or rate limits. Minimal behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence. It is concise and front-loaded, but could include more detail in the same space.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, yet the description does not hint at the return value (task details) or error cases. Insufficient for a get operation without annotations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'id' described as 'Task ID'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Get a task by ID', which is a specific verb-resource pair. It clearly distinguishes from siblings like list_tasks, create_task, delete_task, and update_task.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The usage is implied as retrieving a single task, but no exclusions or alternative references are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HefnySco/agent_mcp_thoughtflow'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server