Google Scholar MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Google Scholar MCP Server
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA hosted MCP server that returns DuckDuckGo search results as structured JSON, with ranked organic results, separate ads, AI answers, and 37 region/language targets for any MCP client.177 npm16 PyPI7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to perform live Google searches and retrieve structured SERP data including organic results, AI Overviews, People Also Ask, AI Mode answers, news, shopping, and short-video results via eight read-only tools.1068 npm14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables fetching any public web page through managed proxies, with optional JavaScript rendering, returning markdown, text, HTML, or structured JSON.165 npm17 PyPI10MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching Google Scholar for academic papers, citations, and author profiles, returning structured JSON results including titles, authors, citation counts, abstracts, and PDF links.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and analyze Google Scholar publications, authors, citations, and download papers.112MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to search and retrieve academic papers, author profiles, citation networks, references, and recommendations via the underlying scholarly API, with batch operations and customizable fields.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching academic papers, exploring citation graphs, and looking up authors from Semantic Scholar's database of 200M+ papers.4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to search academic papers, retrieve detailed paper and author information, explore citation and reference networks, and generate recommendations via a scholarly API.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables searching for academic papers, authors, and citation networks through the Semantic Scholar API. Supports full-text and title search, batch lookups, citation and reference tracking, author profiles, and paper recommendations.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools serve clearly distinct purposes: one performs searches across Google Scholar, while the other retrieves citation formats for a previously returned result. There is no functional overlap, and their complementary relationship is explicit.
Both names share the same provider prefix and follow a snake_case get-style verb, making them predictable. The resource segment differs (cite vs scholar), but this is minor and does not obscure meaning.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a domain as broad as Google Scholar. However, the two tools cover the most essential scholarly search and citation workflows, so the count is borderline but not unreasonable.
The core workflow of searching for scholarly results and retrieving citation formats is well covered. Missing capabilities like fetching a full author profile or a detailed cited-by list are notable but can be worked around via the existing search parameters.