Skip to main content
Glama
HasData

Google Scholar MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Google Scholar MCP Server

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A hosted MCP server that returns DuckDuckGo search results as structured JSON, with ranked organic results, separate ads, AI answers, and 37 region/language targets for any MCP client.
    1
    52 npm
    132 PyPI
    7
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to perform live Google searches and retrieve structured SERP data including organic results, AI Overviews, People Also Ask, AI Mode answers, news, shopping, and short-video results via eight read-only tools.
    10
    413 npm
    178 PyPI
    18
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables searching Google Scholar for academic papers, citations, and author profiles, returning structured JSON results including titles, authors, citation counts, abstracts, and PDF links.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables searching academic papers, exploring citation graphs, and looking up authors from Semantic Scholar's database of 200M+ papers.
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables searching academic literature via Semantic Scholar with relevance filters, batch metadata retrieval, and citation-graph recommendations.
    5
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables academic research through Google Scholar by searching for papers, finding author publications, discovering recent research, and identifying highly cited works through web scraping with natural language queries.
    MIT

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools serve clearly distinct purposes: one performs searches across Google Scholar, while the other retrieves citation formats for a previously returned result. There is no functional overlap, and their complementary relationship is explicit.

Naming Consistency4/5

Both names share the same provider prefix and follow a snake_case get-style verb, making them predictable. The resource segment differs (cite vs scholar), but this is minor and does not obscure meaning.

Tool Count3/5

With only two tools, the server feels thin for a domain as broad as Google Scholar. However, the two tools cover the most essential scholarly search and citation workflows, so the count is borderline but not unreasonable.

Completeness4/5

The core workflow of searching for scholarly results and retrieving citation formats is well covered. Missing capabilities like fetching a full author profile or a detailed cited-by list are notable but can be worked around via the existing search parameters.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues