Skip to main content
Glama
HasData

ChatGPT MCP Server

by HasData
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ChatGPT MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • WebChatMCP.js

      JS-PACKAGE
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to drive ChatGPT's web interface through a built-in persistent browser, requiring only a single manual login. Prompts are sent through temporary incognito chats and the captured answer text is returned as tool results, along with live model listing, login/status probing, and optional HTTP transport.
      8
      3
      Apache 2.0

    • ChatGPT WebSearch MCP

      nekobato
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides access to OpenAI's ChatGPT API with web search capabilities for Claude and other MCP clients. Supports various GPT models with configurable parameters like reasoning effort, temperature, and streaming mode.
      1
      18 npm
      3
      MIT

    • rbac-rag-assistant

      Shrey-Parikh31
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to ask plain-language questions and receive answers grounded only in documents the configured role is cleared to read, with the same access-controlled tools available across any client.
      -
    • apexapi-mcp by apexapi

      apexapi-mcpofficial

      apexapi
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables calling 120+ AI models and reading live web pages (scrape, crawl, structured extract) from any MCP client using one API key.
      9
      60 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another. Its purpose (send a prompt to ChatGPT and return the answer plus sources) is unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    With a single tool there is no mixed convention to penalize. However, the name is an unwieldy prefixed, camelCase string (hasdata_chatgpt_chat_getChatgptAnswer) rather than a clean verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    The narrow, single-endpoint domain means one tool covers the core capability without redundancy. Still, a one-tool surface is thin and leaves no room for related operations like continuing a conversation or fetching sources separately.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers a one-shot query with rich metadata, which fits the described use. But it explicitly has no memory, and there is no way to continue or manage a conversation, so multi-turn workflows are a notable gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources