Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ChatGPT MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides access to OpenAI's ChatGPT API with web search capabilities for Claude and other MCP clients. Supports various GPT models with configurable parameters like reasoning effort, temperature, and streaming mode.
      1
      15 npm
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to ask plain-language questions and receive answers grounded only in documents the configured role is cleared to read, with the same access-controlled tools available across any client.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables calling 120+ AI models and reading live web pages (scrape, crawl, structured extract) from any MCP client using one API key.
      9
      224 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to browse a live catalog of 100+ models with pricing, rankings and measured uptime, check credits and spend, and send chat completions through an OAuth-authenticated, per-connection key capped by a spend limit. Read tools are free, and paid calls are priced and approved before any credit is used.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to perform keyless web searches, extract fully rendered pages into clean Markdown, and automate a shared Chrome browser through page navigation, clicking, typing, reading, screenshots, and backtracking—all without API keys.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for grounded, cited AI: answers questions from live web sources, verifies claims, fact-checks documents, searches and reads URLs, summarises, classifies, and extracts fields, with usage tracking and status.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another. Its purpose (send a prompt to ChatGPT and return the answer plus sources) is unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    With a single tool there is no mixed convention to penalize. However, the name is an unwieldy prefixed, camelCase string (hasdata_chatgpt_chat_getChatgptAnswer) rather than a clean verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    The narrow, single-endpoint domain means one tool covers the core capability without redundancy. Still, a one-tool surface is thin and leaves no room for related operations like continuing a conversation or fetching sources separately.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers a one-shot query with rich metadata, which fits the described use. But it explicitly has no memory, and there is no way to continue or manage a conversation, so multi-turn workflows are a notable gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues