Get Skew Analysis

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Analyze' implies a non-mutating operation, but the description does not confirm whether this is a read-only computation, what data it uses, or how filters like minimum open interest affect results.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler, front-loading the core purpose. It is appropriately concise for what it conveys.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations and minimal parameter guidance, the description is not sufficient for an agent to confidently invoke the tool. The presence of an output schema helps with return-value expectations, but usage context and parameter semantics remain missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool description adds no parameter meaning, and context signals indicate 0% schema description coverage at the tool-parameter level. An agent cannot infer that base_coin selects the cryptocurrency or that min_oi filters by open interest from the description alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies a specific verb and resource: analyze volatility skew and term structure across strikes and expiries. It conveys what the tool computes, though it does not contrast itself with closely related siblings like get_vol_surface_metrics or get_gex_analysis.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings. The description only implies an analysis use case, leaving the agent to guess whether get_vol_surface_metrics or get_skew_analysis is the better fit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.