Skip to main content
Glama
HamzaLatif02

budget-mcp

by HamzaLatif02

Related Servers

Alternatives to budget-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • -
      license
      C
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A simple boilerplate MCP server that provides a basic greeting tool for demonstration purposes. Serves as a starting template for developers to quickly create and deploy custom MCP servers.
      1
      6 npm
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for the WhatsMyBudget Analytics API, providing tools to query budget periods, categories, accounts, and summaries.
      26
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Minimal MCP server that exposes a ping tool for Copilot Studio connectivity testing.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple MCP server that provides a basic greeting tool for saying hello with customizable names. Serves as a boilerplate template for developers to quickly create and deploy new MCP servers.
      1
      6 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple demonstration MCP server that provides an echo tool and resource for learning how to build MCP servers. Serves as a starting point and template for creating custom MCP server implementations.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A simple demonstration MCP server that provides basic greeting functionality and server information. Enables users to generate hello messages and retrieve server details through tools and resources.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: ping for connectivity, add_transaction for inserting data, get_spending_summary for aggregating, and categorize_transaction for classification. There is no functional overlap between any two tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The three functional tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (add_transaction, get_spending_summary, categorize_transaction). The 'ping' tool breaks the pattern by being a bare verb, but it's a standard placeholder and doesn't cause confusion.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 4 tools (one being a placeholder), the server feels under-scoped for a budget application. The count is borderline acceptable, but the lack of essential operations makes it seem thin.

    Completeness2/5

    The server lacks core CRUD functionality: no way to list, update, or delete transactions, and no way to manage categories (add_transaction requires an existing category but there's no create_category tool). Also missing budget-setting features, making the surface significantly incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues