browser_reset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description fully discloses the destructive behavior: closing and discarding the session, losing state. Mentions it starts a fresh session. No contradictions. Provides appropriate behavioral context for a reset operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, each essential. First describes action, second gives use case. No extraneous words. Perfectly front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no parameters, and no annotations, the description fully explains the tool's purpose and behavior. Adequate for an agent to select and invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters (schema is empty with 100% coverage). For zero-parameter tools, baseline is 4. Description adds no parameter info because none needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'close and discard' and resource 'current browser session'. Distinguishes from sibling tools (browser_navigate, browser_back, etc.) which manipulate the same session rather than resetting it. No ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use: 'recover from a wedged or crashed page'. Implies this is not for normal navigation or back/forward actions. Does not provide explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives, but context with sibling tools makes it clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.