veridex-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to veridex-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to verify Israeli companies and assess supplier invoice and payment risk before sending funds, exposing registry-backed evidence, company-change events, invoice gates, and x402 payee-trust checks with deterministic PAY/HOLD/BLOCK and ALLOW/REVIEW/DENY outcomes. It also provides free previews and schema/service discovery tools over remote MCP.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform due diligence, KYB, and supplier or client verification by querying Spanish company registry data cross-referenced with public grants and procurement awards, each fact linking to its official publication.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides counterparty risk checks for any EVM address, returning malicious-history flags, tiered risk scoring, and plain-language summaries via x402 payment.-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceVerified Latin American data for autonomous AI agents via x402 micropayments. Sanctions screening (OFAC SDN + SARLAFT + CNBV + COAF + UAF) with EU AI Act Art.12/13 compliant hash-chain audit trail, entity enrichment (RUES/CNPJ/RFC), and real-time LATAM central bank rates including Argentina dólar blue. $0.02–$0.10 USDC per call on Base and Solana. No API key required.41-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceeu-verify lets AI agents verify any European business partner: company existence (official French SIREN registry), insolvency records (BODACC), EU VAT validation before invoicing (VIES), SIRET/IBAN/LEI checks, address and email verification, French business-day deadlines and EU public tenders. 10 paid MCP tools + a free catalog tool, plus 81 HTTP endpoints. Each call costs $0.001-$0.01 in USDC on1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing verified Latin American data via x402 micropayments. 4 MCP tools: vera_rates (central bank rates CO/MX/BR/CL/PE), vera_sanctions (OFAC+SARLAFT+CNBV+COAF+UAF screening, EU AI Act Art.13), vera_entity (RUES/CNPJ/RFC enrichment), vera_context (AI market intelligence). $0.02–$0.10 USDC per call.4-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Three tools serve clearly distinct purposes: paying for a company lookup, reading the service's own pricing manifest, and checking API health/demand. There is no realistic way to confuse verify_company_by_cif with either of the free informational tools.
All three use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: verify_company_by_cif, get_veridex_info, health_check. The style is predictable and readable throughout.
Three tools is somewhat thin for a server whose core value is a single paid verification endpoint. However, the informational tools (manifest, health) are coherent supporting pieces rather than padding, so it is defensible but borderline.
The core verification operation is covered, including detailed error taxonomy and payment flow. But there is no batch verification, no historical results, and only one real domain action, which is a notable gap for a registry-data service.