Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to glm-subagent-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Delegates coding tasks to the local Claude Code CLI via MCP, offering run, review, and status tools for MCP-compatible agents.
      14 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to make small, bounded decisions around tasks via stdio MCP, supporting source-bound context, durable budgets, bulk jobs, and measured outcomes while leaving planning and reasoning with the main model.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server connecting Claude Code to LM Studio, delegating token-expensive tasks to a local model while keeping the cloud model in control. It reduces cloud context usage by reading files locally and returning only the processed results.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT and Codex to safely work with explicitly authorized local project folders through MCP, providing constrained file reading, searching, patch editing, Git inspection, and whitelisted tasks without exposing arbitrary shell, deletion, or deployment capabilities.
      17
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool is exposed, so there is zero risk of selecting the wrong tool. Its purpose—delegating a self-contained coding task to a GLM sub-agent—is clearly stated and distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses snake_case (`glm_agent`), which is a standard, predictable convention. With only one tool, consistency is trivially satisfied.

    Tool Count4/5

    One tool is slightly below the typical 3–15 range, but the server is a focused, single-purpose delegation wrapper. The tool is substantial rather than trivial, so the count is reasonable though thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the core delegation lifecycle: accept a task, run it in a workdir, return summary and changed files. However, it lacks follow-up operations like status, cancellation, or session continuation, which could be useful for long tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues