diverdict
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| strategize_beginA | 对重要决策启动三家独立出策。调用 strategize_begin 前，必须同时提交需求 problem 和背景 context，不要只转交最后一句问题。从当前可用对话及已读材料中整理与决策相关的目标、处境、约束、偏好和事实，保留影响判断的细节、不同选项及用户最新更正；未解决的冲突如实说明。展开‘这个、刚才的方案’等指代，把相关材料内容写入参数，不能只给文件路径、链接或‘见上文’：各实例无法访问宿主历史、文件或网络。区分事实、推测与未知，不编造背景，不混入宿主预设结论、整段聊天记录或宿主指令。确无额外背景时明确说明；关键缺失且影响判断时先澄清，不重复询问已有信息；用户要求直接判断时注明未知与信息局限后继续。材料过长时保留关键事实和限制，不静默截断；仍超限则先与用户缩小决策范围。返回三个独立 job 和宿主执行指令；宿主执行后调用 strategize_submit。服务不生成策略，不需 API key。 |
| strategize_submitA | 接收完整三家方略，返回三份并行质询 job。逐一转交给独立实例，收齐质询后调用 strategize_verdict。相同输入可安全重试。 |
| strategize_verdictA | 接收完整三家质询，返回贾诩的独立生成 job。宿主仍须执行该 job，再向用户交付最终方略与最脆弱一环；此后无二审。相同输入可安全重试。 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct workflow phase: begin starts the process, submit accepts the three strategies and returns interrogation jobs, and verdict accepts the interrogations and returns the final judgment. Clear input/output boundaries prevent meaningful confusion despite the shared pattern of returning jobs.
All tools use a consistent lowercase snake_case style and share the strategize_ prefix, making the sequence easy to follow. The suffix pattern is slightly inconsistent because begin and submit are verbs while verdict is a noun, but this is a minor deviation.
Three tools is an appropriate size for this narrowly scoped, explicitly three-phase workflow. Each tool plays a necessary role and the server does not appear over- or under-provisioned.
The tool set covers the entire advertised lifecycle: initiation, submission of strategies for cross-examination, and final verdict production. The description explicitly states there is no second review, so there are no obvious missing steps or dead ends.