Skip to main content
Glama
HBlackfoxx

solidit-mcp-server

by HBlackfoxx

Search Solodit Findings

search_findings

Search 49,000+ blockchain security audit findings using 14+ filters. Combine keywords, severity, firms, tags, date ranges, and more to find relevant vulnerabilities.

Instructions

Search Solodit's database of 49,000+ blockchain security audit findings with full filter power. Returns structured results with title, impact, summary, tags, firm, scores, and content preview. All parameters are optional -- a bare call returns recent findings.

This is the most powerful search tool with 14+ filters. For simpler queries, consider:

  • get_finding_detail: Get full content of a specific finding by ID or slug

  • search_by_tag: Quick vulnerability pattern lookup by tag (sorted by quality)

  • recent_findings: Browse latest discoveries from the last N days

When to use: You need complex multi-filter queries combining keywords, firms, date ranges, and other advanced filters that the convenience tools don't support.

Available filters:

  • keywords: Free-text search across titles and content

  • impact: Severity (HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, GAS)

  • tags: Vulnerability type — top tags: Business Logic, Validation, Wrong Math, Front-Running, DOS, Fee On Transfer, Oracle, Reentrancy, Access Control, Decimals, Liquidation, Overflow/Underflow, Slippage, Missing-Logic, Rounding, Stale Price, ERC4626, First Depositor Issue, Chainlink, Flash Loan, Weird ERC20, ERC20, Missing Check, Fund Lock, Uniswap, Vote, ERC721, NFT, Sandwich Attack, Lending Pool, Precision Loss, Replay Attack, Share Inflation, Read-only Reentrancy, and 170+ more

  • firms: Audit firm — all 30: Code4rena, Zokyo, OpenZeppelin, Pashov Audit Group, Cantina, Sherlock, Halborn, Quantstamp, MixBytes, OtterSec, Spearbit, TrailOfBits, Cyfrin, ConsenSys, Codehawks, SigmaPrime, Shieldify, Immunefi, Trust Security, Hexens, ZachObront, Guardian Audits, AuditOne, Recon Audits, 0x52, Oxorio, Kann, ThreeSigma, Hans, Naman

  • protocol_category: All 32: Dexes, CDP, Services, Cross Chain, Yield, Liquid Staking, Synthetics, Staking Pool, Yield Aggregator, Payments, Bridge, Launchpad, RWA, Leveraged Farming, Indexes, Liquidity manager, Options Vault, Oracle, Derivatives, Lending, Privacy, Insurance, NFT Marketplace, NFT Lending, Algo-Stables, RWA Lending, Gaming, Prediction Market, Farm, Decentralized Stablecoin, Reserve Currency, Uncollateralized Lending

  • language: All 17: Solidity, Rust, Go, Move, TypeScript, Vyper, FunC, JavaScript, Cairo, Dart, Python, Circom, Cosmos, Sway, Yul, Noir, Tact

  • protocol: Protocol name (partial match)

  • finder: Auditor handle (partial match)

  • quality_min / rarity_min: Minimum score thresholds (0-5)

  • date_range: Preset ranges (30, 60, 90 days, or alltime)

  • date_after: Custom date cutoff (ISO format)

  • sort_by / sort_direction: Ordering (Recency/Quality/Rarity, Desc/Asc)

  • page / page_size: Pagination controls

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number (default: 1)
tagsNoFilter by vulnerability tags. Available tags (use exact casing): Business Logic, Validation, Wrong Math, Front-Running, DOS, Fee On Transfer, Oracle, Reentrancy, Access Control, Don't update state, Decimals, Liquidation, Overflow/Underflow, Admin, Denial-Of-Service, Slippage, Missing-Logic, Rounding, Stale Price, ERC4626, First Depositor Issue, Chainlink, Flash Loan, Weird ERC20, Configuration, ERC20, Missing Check, Fund Lock, Uniswap, Vote, ERC721, Coding-Bug, NFT, Sandwich Attack, Approve, Chain Reorganization Attack, Swap, Deposit/Reward tokens, ERC1155, Gas Limit, Lending Pool, Blacklisted, Allowance, Bypass limit, call vs transfer, Initialization, Auction, SafeTransfer, transferFrom vs safeTransferFrom, Type casting, Ownership, Precision Loss, Replay Attack, Grief Attack, Refund Ether, Share Inflation, ERC777, Code Quality, Pause, Upgradable, EIP-4626, Min/Max Cap Validation, Payable, Timing, TWAP, Vault, Cross Chain, Delegate, External Call, Initial Deposit, Bridge, Broken Loop, External Contract, LayerZero, Read-only Reentrancy, and 100+ more
firmsNoFilter by audit firm. All available firms (use exact casing): Code4rena, Zokyo, OpenZeppelin, Pashov Audit Group, Cantina, Sherlock, Halborn, Quantstamp, MixBytes, OtterSec, Spearbit, TrailOfBits, Cyfrin, ConsenSys, Codehawks, SigmaPrime, Shieldify, Immunefi, Trust Security, Hexens, ZachObront, Guardian Audits, AuditOne, Recon Audits, 0x52, Oxorio, Kann, ThreeSigma, Hans, Naman
finderNoFilter by auditor/finder handle (partial match)
impactNoFilter by impact severity. Values: HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, GAS
sort_byNoSort results by field. Default: Recency
keywordsNoSearch keywords in finding titles and content. Example: 'reentrancy', 'oracle manipulation', 'flash loan'
languageNoFilter by programming language. All available languages (use exact casing): Solidity, Rust, Go, Move, TypeScript, Vyper, FunC, JavaScript, Cairo, Dart, Python, Circom, Cosmos, Sway, Yul, Noir, Tact
protocolNoFilter by protocol name (partial match). Example: 'Aave', 'Uniswap'
page_sizeNoResults per page (default: 20, max: 100)
date_afterNoFilter findings after this date (ISO format: 2024-01-01). Overrides date_range if both provided.
date_rangeNoFilter by date range: last 30/60/90 days or all time
rarity_minNoMinimum rarity score (0-5)
quality_minNoMinimum quality score (0-5)
sort_directionNoSort direction. Default: Desc
protocol_categoryNoFilter by protocol category. All available categories (use exact casing): Dexes, CDP, Services, Cross Chain, Yield, Liquid Staking, Synthetics, Staking Pool, Yield Aggregator, Payments, Bridge, Launchpad, RWA, Leveraged Farming, Indexes, Liquidity manager, Options Vault, Oracle, Derivatives, Lending, Privacy, Insurance, NFT Marketplace, NFT Lending, Algo-Stables, RWA Lending, Gaming, Prediction Market, Farm, Decentralized Stablecoin, Reserve Currency, Uncollateralized Lending
max_content_lengthNoMax characters of content preview per finding (default: 500, max: 5000)
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states that parameters are optional, a bare call returns recent findings, and returns structured results. It does not explicitly state read-only behavior, side effects, rate limits, or performance characteristics. While safe for a search tool, more disclosure would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured: a concise overview, then a bulleted list of siblings with guidance, then 'When to use', then a complete list of filters. Every sentence adds value, and the most important information (purpose, differentiation) is front-loaded. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (17 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description covers purpose, usage guidance, filter details, and return structure. It is nearly complete, but could mention behavioral aspects like read-only nature or any rate limits to be fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by listing all filters with examples, enumerating top tags, all firms, and categories, and providing context like 'example values'. This goes beyond the schema descriptions, aiding the agent in understanding parameter usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Search' and the resource 'Solodit's database of blockchain security audit findings'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by positioning as the most powerful with 14+ filters, and mentions specific alternatives for simpler queries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use: 'complex multi-filter queries... that the convenience tools don't support'. It also provides clear alternatives: get_finding_detail, search_by_tag, recent_findings, with brief descriptions of each. This is excellent guidance for the agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HBlackfoxx/solidit-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server