Skip to main content
Glama
HB-0921

OpenFab MCP

by HB-0921

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenFab MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables conversational creation and editing of STEP CAD models through MCP clients like Codex, Claude, or Cursor, with real-time 3D browser preview and tools for primitives, booleans, mounting holes, flanges, and gripper bases.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD/CAM automation, exposing 84 tools for sketching, modeling, assembly, inspection, export, and G-code post-processing through any MCP-compatible client.
      85
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables safe, local Siemens NX automation through MCP, providing tools for part creation, sketching, extrusion, feature manipulation, measurement, save-as, and STEP export within a confined workspace.
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server for validating, auto-fixing, and scaffolding TwinCAT 3 XML files using deterministic code quality tools and IEC 61131-3 OOP checks. It enables AI assistants to perform structural validation, apply safe fixes, and generate canonical code skeletons for industrial automation projects.
      16
      37
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    step_analyze is clearly distinct from the FANUC LS tools, and the three fanuc_ tools have reasonably distinct outputs: parse returns structure, lint returns diagnostics, generate produces a draft. fanuc_parse_ls and fanuc_lint_ls both consume LS source, so a small amount of overlap exists.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The FANUC tools follow a consistent fanuc_<verb>_ls pattern, but step_analyze breaks the convention by placing the object before the verb and omitting a domain prefix. The overall naming is readable and mostly predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is appropriate for this narrow offline manufacturing scope. Each tool serves a distinct purpose: STEP analysis, LS parsing, LS linting, and LS draft generation.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core offline workflow for STEP analysis and FANUC LS handling: parse, lint, and generate. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct STEP-to-LS conversion or LS editing utilities, but the explicit offline/non-production scope keeps the surface reasonable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues