OpenFab MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to OpenFab MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables conversational creation and editing of STEP CAD models through MCP clients like Codex, Claude, or Cursor, with real-time 3D browser preview and tools for primitives, booleans, mounting holes, flanges, and gripper bases.1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceCross-OEM industrial machine intelligence. Normalizes telemetry across 16 manufacturer families (Fanuc, Siemens, Haas, DMG Mori, Mazak), enables plain-English operational automation, and produces tamper-evident work records. 14 MCP tools.14-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD/CAM automation, exposing 84 tools for sketching, modeling, assembly, inspection, export, and G-code post-processing through any MCP-compatible client.85MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables safe, local Siemens NX automation through MCP, providing tools for part creation, sketching, extrusion, feature manipulation, measurement, save-as, and STEP export within a confined workspace.19MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server for validating, auto-fixing, and scaffolding TwinCAT 3 XML files using deterministic code quality tools and IEC 61131-3 OOP checks. It enables AI assistants to perform structural validation, apply safe fixes, and generate canonical code skeletons for industrial automation projects.1637MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for AI-driven CAD operations, enabling parametric modeling, build, inspection, measurement, rendering, and diff comparison with STEP, DXF, and GLB export.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
step_analyze is clearly distinct from the FANUC LS tools, and the three fanuc_ tools have reasonably distinct outputs: parse returns structure, lint returns diagnostics, generate produces a draft. fanuc_parse_ls and fanuc_lint_ls both consume LS source, so a small amount of overlap exists.
The FANUC tools follow a consistent fanuc_<verb>_ls pattern, but step_analyze breaks the convention by placing the object before the verb and omitting a domain prefix. The overall naming is readable and mostly predictable.
Four tools is appropriate for this narrow offline manufacturing scope. Each tool serves a distinct purpose: STEP analysis, LS parsing, LS linting, and LS draft generation.
The set covers the core offline workflow for STEP analysis and FANUC LS handling: parse, lint, and generate. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct STEP-to-LS conversion or LS editing utilities, but the explicit offline/non-production scope keeps the surface reasonable.