Skip to main content
Glama
Guipegoraro

totvs-tickets-mcp

by Guipegoraro

Related Servers

Alternatives to totvs-tickets-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for thinker-ci, exposing tickets, CI/CD pipelines, project management data, and AI-agent sessions as tools and resources for Claude Code and other MCP clients.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that exposes the Poli Júnior Pipedrive CRM to Claude as composable tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server providing access to Brazilian public data (CNPJ, CEP, banks, holidays) via BrasilAPI. For Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible clients.
      15
      22 npm
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A custom MCP server exposing database, ticketing, and external-API tools to both Claude Desktop and a self-built autonomous agent powered by Groq's free-tier LLaMA 3.3.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: contact info, departments, notifications count, ticket comments, ticket detail, filter options, ticket listing, priority reasons, status list, user search, and identity info. No two tools overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools start with 'totvs_' followed by a descriptive noun or noun_action. There is a minor inconsistency between singular and plural forms (e.g., 'totvs_ticket_comentarios' vs 'totvs_tickets_listar'), but the overall pattern is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools covering identity, search, filtering, and ticket details, the count is well-scoped for a ticket support portal. It provides sufficient functionality without being excessive.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is heavily read-oriented, lacking essential create, update, or close operations for tickets. While it covers querying and listing well, there are no tools to modify tickets, making the surface incomplete for full ticket lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues