totvs-tickets-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to totvs-tickets-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server to manage GestSup tickets via an LLM, with tools for creating, reading, commenting, and searching tickets.13MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables searching a TOTVS Protheus ERP knowledge base using vector similarity and reranking.1-

thinker-mcpofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for thinker-ci, exposing tickets, CI/CD pipelines, project management data, and AI-agent sessions as tools and resources for Claude Code and other MCP clients.-- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRead-only MCP server that exposes the Poli Júnior Pipedrive CRM to Claude as composable tools.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server providing access to Brazilian public data (CNPJ, CEP, banks, holidays) via BrasilAPI. For Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible clients.1522 npm8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA custom MCP server exposing database, ticketing, and external-API tools to both Claude Desktop and a self-built autonomous agent powered by Groq's free-tier LLaMA 3.3.-
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: contact info, departments, notifications count, ticket comments, ticket detail, filter options, ticket listing, priority reasons, status list, user search, and identity info. No two tools overlap in functionality.
All tools start with 'totvs_' followed by a descriptive noun or noun_action. There is a minor inconsistency between singular and plural forms (e.g., 'totvs_ticket_comentarios' vs 'totvs_tickets_listar'), but the overall pattern is predictable and clear.
With 11 tools covering identity, search, filtering, and ticket details, the count is well-scoped for a ticket support portal. It provides sufficient functionality without being excessive.
The tool set is heavily read-oriented, lacking essential create, update, or close operations for tickets. While it covers querying and listing well, there are no tools to modify tickets, making the surface incomplete for full ticket lifecycle management.