Skip to main content
Glama
Grinv

TMDB MCP Server

Get user reviews

get_reviews
Read-only

Fetch user reviews for a movie or TV show, with author, rating, and review text. Requires the TMDB ID from a search.

Instructions

Get user reviews for a movie or TV show (author, their rating if the reviewer left one — it can be null, and the review text, clipped to ~1500 characters). Get the id from search_movies/search_tv.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesTMDB numeric id.
pageNo1-based page number for pagination (TMDB returns up to 20 results per page, max 500).
media_typeYesMedia type: 'movie' or 'tv'.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageYes
resultsYes
total_pagesYes
total_resultsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.10.1
    • changedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / created_at / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "format": "date-time",
      +    "pattern": "^(?:(?:\\d\\d[2468][048]|\\d\\d[13579][26]|\\d\\d0[48]|[02468][048]00|[13579][26]00)-02-29|\\d{4}-(?:(?:0[13578]|1[02])-(?:0[1-9]|[12]\\d|3[01])|(?:0[469]|11)-(?:0[1-9]|[12]\\d|30)|(?:02)-(?:0[1-9]|1\\d|2[0-8])))T(?:(?:[01]\\d|2[0-3]):[0-5]\\d(?::[0-5]\\d(?:\\.\\d+)?)?(?:Z))$",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / created_at / default
      Added value: +null
  2. Addedv0.8.1
  3. Removedv0.8.0
  4. First observedv0.3.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only and open-world. The description adds that review text is clipped to ~1500 characters and that rating can be null, providing useful behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (two sentences), front-loaded with purpose, and contains no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple output and clear schema, the description fully covers what the tool does, including return fields and clipping behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and parameters are well-documented. The description adds value by explaining where to obtain the 'id' parameter, justifying a score above baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get user reviews for a movie or TV show', specifying the verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools that search or retrieve other entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It advises using IDs from search_movies/search_tv, providing context on prerequisites, though it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.